Subproject quickplan pdf#
Subproject quickplan software#
Subproject quickplan mac#

And' the 'sub-project' feature was well thought-out. The integration with other Project and GTD Apps as well as email is certainly an appreciated feature. As a stand-alone App I think QPP is thet good.ДЄdditionally, QPP fits quite nicely with most all of my non-professionally based projects and integrates just as well with my professionally based projects. I recommended it to several of my friends and the architects who were always reluctant to such a tool, are very interested and starting to get into too.ДЄs with many folks I don't often script reviews but I'm drafting this just 3-days post total knee replacement.

Subproject quickplan software#

I tested and worked with planning software for a long time, this is probably the best concept of user friendliness and ease of usage I ever used. And they are open for any suggestion which makes sense to them. Reaction of the software people is amazing fast and competent. Sharing with collaborators works fine too, respecting the caveats not using the project at the same time. So thanks to iCloud integration it can be handled with all three devices.

Subproject quickplan mac#

I am using the iPhone App as well and also the Mac version. Integration with contacts is also a very good idea.

Subproject quickplan pdf#

Printout via PDF is also very practice oriented. It is very intuitive and fits to my needs. Handling it on an iPad is maybe the best adoption of a program from a desktop to tablet. After working with for my first construction project I can conclude, that this is an excellent tool to plan and control a project. Looking for a userfriendly and easy to handle tool, I found Quick Plan. But donвЂ™t expect the app to create an optimal (or even feasible) project schedule for you, or to report when your handcrafted schedule is unworkable. ItвЂ™s okay if you are satisfied with manually managing task dependencies and resource conflicts. start as late as possible.ДЇinally, metrics and project stats are really lacking. No way to set tasks to start as early as possible vs. No provision to specify end and compute latest start date. Third, app assumes that you have a known start and want to compute the finish. Critical path calculations become meaningless. If you create a two tasks and make one a predecessor of the other then the app wonвЂ™t properly enforce start-before-finish when start or duration changes, and wonвЂ™t remove float if predecessor duration shortens or task finishes early. Second, the app does not respect task dependencies.

App provides no indication that thereвЂ™s a conflict, and no way to auto-schedule activities to remove the conflict.

Unfortunately the scheduling logic is sorely lacking some basic features for a project management tool.ДЇirst, while the app allows you to assign resources to a task, it doesnвЂ™t prevent you from having multiple simultaneous tasks all using the same resource.

App looks good and the user interface works well.